-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Daniel Macks wrote:

| do you really mean to declare that pango1-xft2 and pango1-xft2-ft219
| are binary-compatible now? We should have just done this for pc months
| ago instead of all the pathname nonsense to find the "hidden" files
| for pango1-xft2-ft219.

I was under the impression that they were, iff pango1-xft2-dev is no
longer in use.  ;)

Perhaps we should switch it to go the other way, before it's too late?
- --
Benjamin Reed a.k.a. Ranger Rick
Fink, KDE, and Mac OS X development
http://www.racoonfink.com/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD4DBQFIEhnfUu+jZtP2Zf4RAkJqAKCY5RGBWiHES750+8ZelynIQlOp9wCYh7ja
j2KMgmTOdPn4jgsCfnYTqg==
=qdOi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel

Reply via email to