Daniel Macks wrote: [] >> Keeping a pre-pangocairo/stable tree alongside a pangocairo/unstable >> tree will not work, either. How could we then move packages from >> unstable to stable? > > Mixing stable and unstable (i.e., using older "stable" packages once > one has started using "unstable", or cherry-picking just a few > unstables into a stable system) has never really been supported and > definitely never expected to really work well.
Right. Just to avoid misunderstandings: I was not talking about what a user should do, I addressed what should happen on the cvs *server*. The point I try to make is that the current stable tree will have to die and be replaced by the content of unstable-pangocairo-branch when this is merged back into the main branch. Keeping the stable tree and letting it fall further behind, which will be greatly accelerated with the pangaocairo deployment, would be a fatal mistake. -- Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
