On Oct 21, 2008, at 1:23 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:

>
> On Oct 20, 2008, at 9:06 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
>
>> David Reiser wrote:
>> []
>>> I've looked at this some more, and I think it's simpler. html-parser
>>> looks to me to be provided by both 5.8.6 and 5.8.8, but html-tree is
>>> provided by neither. Consequently, I think the fix is to delete line
>>> 339 of VirtPackage.pm so that html-tree does not appear in the "if
>>> ($perlver >= 5.008008)" clause.
>>
>> I think you are right. I am bouncing this now to fink-core, because
>> changing this concerns also the perl588 package on Tiger for which
>> this
>> list of "provided" packages was originally made. According to cvs,  
>> the
>> list was introduced into Virtual.pm before Leopard was released  
>> (1.111
>>     (rangerri 14-Aug-06)). Maybe someone remembers why it was done.
>>
>
> Does the perl588 package on Tiger provide html-tree as it claims, or
> do we also need to fix that?
>
>  -- Dave


 From what I can see, fink's perl588 on Tiger neither provides html- 
tree, nor does fink under Tiger report that html-tree is provided.

Dave
--
David Reiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel

Reply via email to