On Oct 21, 2008, at 8:29 AM, David Reiser wrote: > > On Oct 21, 2008, at 1:23 AM, David R. Morrison wrote: > >> >> On Oct 20, 2008, at 9:06 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: >> >>> David Reiser wrote: >>> [] >>>> I've looked at this some more, and I think it's simpler. html- >>>> parser >>>> looks to me to be provided by both 5.8.6 and 5.8.8, but html-tree >>>> is >>>> provided by neither. Consequently, I think the fix is to delete >>>> line >>>> 339 of VirtPackage.pm so that html-tree does not appear in the "if >>>> ($perlver >= 5.008008)" clause. >>> >>> I think you are right. I am bouncing this now to fink-core, because >>> changing this concerns also the perl588 package on Tiger for which >>> this >>> list of "provided" packages was originally made. According to cvs, >>> the >>> list was introduced into Virtual.pm before Leopard was released >>> (1.111 >>> (rangerri 14-Aug-06)). Maybe someone remembers why it was done. >>> >> >> Does the perl588 package on Tiger provide html-tree as it claims, or >> do we also need to fix that? >> >> -- Dave > > > From what I can see, fink's perl588 on Tiger neither provides html- > tree, nor does fink under Tiger report that html-tree is provided. > > Dave > --
OK, I've updated fink (HEAD and current branch) so this will be fixed in the next release. -- Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
