On Aug 30, 2009, at 8:58 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
> > On Aug 31, 2009, at 11:48 AM, William G. Scott wrote: > >> >> 2. The 10.6 64-bit tree of fink is in a situation where things in >> "unstable" work but in "stable" don't (older versions, no gfortran >> 4.4, etc). Maybe this is a good chance to move everything en masse >> that works into stable. >> > > Bill, > > Yes, in a rush to get the stable tree into usable shape in a very > short period of time, I didn't check to see which unstable packages > were ready. I'm asking people to hold off moving things to stable > for another day or two while I finish my pruning job, but after that > I imagine that quite a few things can be moved (with adequate > testing on so on, please!). > > -- Dave > Dear Dave: Sorry, didn't mean to alarm anyone. I am just feeling guilty for having not invested any time in the stable tree (and am in no danger of messing with it any time soon). You can pretty much assume anything in stable with my name on it __isn't__ good for 10.6, fwiw. Bill ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [email protected] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
