Jack Howarth wrote: [] > Then perhaps we should just have fink cvs purge *.la files when the > debs are created on x86_64 for now and see how well that works out. > Considering > that folks need to do a clean bootstrap anyway because of the Xquartz issue > we might as well bit the bullet for x86_64 fink now. If folks have to many > problems in the near term they could always drop back to i386 fink until all > of the issues are solved with the .la removal in x86_64. I would be more > than happy to test that change.
The irony is, of course, that if you do a clean bootstrap, then there is no need to purge the *.la files. It would be pure sports. The need only comes in if you want to upgrade from a previous system where more *.la files were around. -- Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
