On 04/09/2009, at 22:41, Alexander Hansen wrote: > Jack Howarth wrote: >> Shouldn't the Snow Leopard information on the >> finkproject home page be updated to tell folks >> if they had Xquartz > 2.3.3.2 installed on their >> Leopard machine that a clean installation of >> fink will be required after upgrading to Snow >> Leopard? > Just checking in about this. It looks like the 10.5.X/Xquartz-2.4.0 > upgrade path is definitely hosed. If we're 100% sure that Xquartz <= > 2.3.3.2 will upgrade properly, then we probably should indeed amend > the news item accordingly. On the other hand, if we're not sure, > perhaps we should just tell anybody who's ever used Xquartz to do a > clean install, just in case.
I second that. I’m not sure about specific versions of Xquartz, but at any rate we’re getting more users with problems in this 10.5/Xquartz -- > 10.6 upgrade path: /usr/lib/X11/libfontconfig.1.dylib has compatibility version 6.0.0 on 10.5.8, latest Xquartz whilst on 10.6 its compatibility version is 5.0.0. I do believe we should have a note about this situation on Fink's Web site. Cheers, -- monipol http://finkers.wordpress.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
