On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 08:16:55AM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote:
>
> On Sep 11, 2009, at 7:52 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
>>
>> 2) At least one core maintainer had no objections to the
>> concept of upgrading those.
>
> Jack,
>
> Perhaps you misread the message in question, but in fact there WAS an
> objection to the upgrade you proposed, but you went ahead and did it
> anyway.
>
> This caused much work by other people to clean up after you.
>
> -- Dave
Dave,
If you are referring to the BuildDepends on bzip2-dev that had
absolutely nothing to do with the observed breakage. Also, the
package (as I explained later on fink-devel never looks at
the fink directories during the build so the bzip2-dev
dependency can be dropped without concern). The only other
option is to disable the bzip2 support entirely.
My cardinal sin here is to be at all interested to with
actual progress of this project which seems to be quite
tangential to the internal politics. Sorry for wasting all
of your and mine time over the last few years. Won't repeat
the mistake.
Jack
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
