On Oct 11, 2009, at 11:47 PM, Tomoaki Okayama wrote: > Thanks for your suggestion. I think the following way > >> You could have texlive-texmf *just* >> "Replaces" it, and then supply an updated tetex-texmf that is empty >> and just specifies "Depends:texlive-texmf". > > is a good solution, if Fink officially employs TeX Live and > drops teTeX, with the permission of the maintainer of tetex*. > > Tomoaki Okayama >
I do have one concern about this. As one user expressed on the mailing list today, people should not be forced to switch to texlive immediately (perhaps not ever). There are several possible reasons: (1) it is a very large download, (2) they may have customized tetex in some way and need time to adjust to the new distribution, (3) other reasons I haven't thought of. I wonder if there is some way to handle this which would allow people to keep the old tetex if they want to? -- Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
