Max, How am I supported to interpret the sudden appearance of... Taking over
JF in https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2994489&group_id=17203&atid=414256 immediately after I make the wrong choice (in JF's eyes) of the two alernatives for packaging the info files that Daniel Macks gave me? Am I to expect the packages to be seized whenever a particular reviewer disagrees with documentation packaging issues. I would note that even debian doesn't package the info files for gcc-4.4 at all. Jack On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 01:00:43AM +0200, Max Horn wrote: > Hi Jack, > > could you please elaborate what went wrong here, which package exactly was > modified when by whom in which way that you take offense? > > Thanks for the clarification, > Max > > Am 03.05.2010 um 00:42 schrieb Jack Howarth: > > > Can someone explain to me at what point did it > > become acceptable behavior here to make random > > package grabs when another developer has a > > disagreement over packaging. After spending > > literally months upstream submitting patches > > and testresults to keep the FSF gcc 4.5 release > > in decent shape on fink, it is obscence that someone > > thinks nothing of grabbing the package grab > > over documentation issues. > > I should have known better than expect any > > different behaviors here than I have been subjected > > to in the past. Trully disgraceful. > > Jack > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > > Fink-devel mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel > > Subscription management: > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [email protected] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
