Actually it appears that my last round of packaging on...
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2992713&group_id=17203&atid=414256
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2994489&group_id=17203&atid=414256
works as intended and the info files are avialable when the main
gcc4X package is installed. I still have strong reservations about JF's
request that I refactor these packages into a basename gcc4x-compiler with
a gcc4x-shlibs and gcc split-off. This seems to violate fink policy since
the main package basename isn't part of the shlibs splitoff. Do we
really want to go this route?
Jack
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
