The only resolution that I see is to move texlive* and ptex* to stable.  Are 
they ready?

  -- Dave


On Jul 9, 2010, at 1:37 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:

> On 7/9/10 11:58 AM, Tomoaki Okayama wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> At Fri, 9 Jul 2010 08:07:03 -0600,
>> David R. Morrison wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Jul 9, 2010, at 7:31 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> [1] Why the buildworld is building the ptex-base from stable is a whole
>>>> other issue, and I have no idea as to why it's doing this.  It does
>>>> build ptex-base/unstable, but likes to build and use anew
>>>> ptex-base/stable in the middle of runs.
>>> 
>>> Well, I think I can explain this.  The ptex-base in stable has a long list 
>>> of Provides:
>>> 
>>> Provides:<<
>>>   tetex-base, tetex3-base, ptex3-base, mendexk,
>>>   context, dvipdfm, epstopdf, pdftex, tetex-macosx,
>>>   (%type_raw[-nox] = .) xdvik
>>>  <<
>>> 
>>> whereas the ptex-base in unstable only Provides ptex3-base and mendexk.
>>> 
>>> This means that if another package asks for tetex3-base, for example, then 
>>> fink has two choices: ptex-base and tetex-base.  Since ptex-base is earlier 
>>> in the alphabet, the automated script chooses ptex-base.  But since only 
>>> the stable version Provides tetex3-base, the stable version is used.
>>> 
>>> I do not know why the Provides line in ptex-base was changed.
>>> 
>> Thanks for the explanation. The reason for the change of Provides
>> is that ptex-base in unstable becomes a small package, like xetex,
>> whereas ptex-base in stable provides all teTeX + additional pTeX.
>> 
>> TeX Live package is very huge. If ptex-base in unstable provides
>> texlive-base, another huge package comes into being there, and
>> we do not like it. So we decided that ptex-base does not provides
>> texlive-base (and tetex-base, too).
>> 
>> Anyway:
>> 
>> At Fri, 09 Jul 2010 09:31:25 -0400,
>> Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:
>>> 
>>> ...  Could you please modify ptex-base in stable to
>>> conflicts/replaces with texlive-base? so that the swapping can take
>>> place gracefully?
>>> 
>> Committed. Please check it.
> 
> Thanks.  This changed the error report.  I now get:
> 
> ****
> While trying to install:
>   ptex-base-3.1.10-1004
> 
> The following inconsistencies found:
>   Unsatisfied dependency in ptex-texmf: texlive-base | texlive-nox-base
> ****
> 
> This seems to come from ptex-texmf/unstable explicitly Depending: on 
> texlive-base.
> 
> Hanspeter
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
> What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
> Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
> _______________________________________________
> Fink-devel mailing list
> Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
> Subscription management:
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Reply via email to