I confirm these findings, I also tried to build vs. gmp5 and got the same 
results.  I need to report these upstream.

Oddly enough.  The 'thorough' tests pass cleanly on powerpc-darwin8 
(about 4 days run-time).

Fang

> In the process of building gcc45, ppl-0.10.2-4 on 10.5/i386 fails during
> tests with this error (dmacks seems to have gotten the exact same
> failure on 10.6/i386):
>
> echo "***" ./ppl_lpsol -s -p1 -c -oobtained "-n modglob.mps" >>obtained
> ./ppl_lpsol -s -p1 -c -oobtained -n
> ../../../demos/ppl_lpsol/examples/modglob.mps >/dev/null
> /usr/bin/grep -E "^Optimum value: "
> ../../../demos/ppl_lpsol/expected_mpz >expected_optima && /usr/bin/grep
> -E "^Optimum value: " obtained >obtained_optima && diff -u
> expected_optima obtained_optima
> --- expected_optima   2011-03-22 21:57:54.000000000 -0400
> +++ obtained_optima   2011-03-22 21:57:54.000000000 -0400
> @@ -1,9 +1,10 @@
> -Optimum value: -3
> -Optimum value: 2
> +Optimum value: -2
> +Optimum value: 1
>  Optimum value: 24.33333333
>  Optimum value: 43
>  Optimum value: 3089
>  Optimum value: 5201
> +Optimum value: -2
>  Optimum value: 0
>  Optimum value: 225494.9632
>  Optimum value: -464.7531429
> @@ -15,8 +16,8 @@
>  Optimum value: -73.36896911
>  Optimum value: 149.5887662
>  Optimum value: 964.30053
> -Optimum value: -3.75
> -Optimum value: 2.5
> +Optimum value: -2
> +Optimum value: 1
>  Optimum value: -1749.90013
>  Optimum value: 0
>  Optimum value: 834.6823529
> @@ -44,9 +45,10 @@
>  Optimum value: 0
>  Optimum value: -70
>  Optimum value: 0
> +Optimum value: -2
>  Optimum value: 0
>  Optimum value: 3438.2921
> -Optimum value: 2.5
> +Optimum value: 1
>  Optimum value: 46.42857143
>  Optimum value: 0
>  Optimum value: 0
> make[4]: *** [check-local] Error 1
> make[3]: *** [check-am] Error 2
>
> It was originally thought that the failure was due to 10.5 using
> gcc-4.0, but the test still fails the same way with revision -4 which
> forces gcc-4.2.
>
> For the record, ppl9-0.11.2-1 does pass tests OK.  Would it make sense
> to update gcc-4(4/5) to use ppl9?
>
> Hanspeter
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the
> growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses
> are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software
> be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker
> today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar
> _______________________________________________
> Fink-devel mailing list
> Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
> Subscription management:
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
>

David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
http://www.achronix.com/


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the
growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses
are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software 
be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker 
today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Reply via email to