> It was originally thought that the failure was due to 10.5 using gcc-4.0, but > the test still fails the same way with revision -4 which forces gcc-4.2. > > For the record, ppl9-0.11.2-1 does pass tests OK. Would it make sense to > update gcc-4(4/5) to use ppl9?
Jack and I recently discussed a strategy for upgrading the gmp/mpfr/mpc/ppl/cloog dependencies offline. Jack, care to summarize? Fang David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ http://www.achronix.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
