On Sep 15, 2011, at 7:05 AM, Sébastien Maret wrote: > > Le 15 sept. 2011 à 15:51, Alexander Hansen a écrit : > >> We probably don't want just to dump packages into stable without doing a >> little testing to make sure they all actually work. ;-) One option would >> be something like the following: > > > Is this really needed? In my experience, the unstable branch contains much > less broken packages than the stable one; this is because most maintainers > only test (and therefore fix) packages from the unstable branch. >
But there are also lots of unmaintained things in unstable, many of them very old, so I think it would be dangerous to just dump everything to stable. I like Alexander's approach. -- Dave P.S. In CVS, it would be fairly straightforward to remove commit authority to the unstable branch for everyone except fink-core members, for example. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop What are the key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses from deploying virtual desktops? How do next-generation virtual desktops provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and more affordable virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
