Hello, Could gcc46 be moved to 10.5/stable and 10.6/stable ? One of my package depends on that version of the compiler, so I can't move it to stable.
A more general question: now that we've only have a stable branch in 10.7, wouldn't it make sense to drop the unstable branches in 10.5 and 10.6 (or rather rename the unstable branches to stable) ? Maintaining stable and unstable versions on 5 different OS/arch (10.7/x86_64, 10.6/x86_64, 10.5/i386 and 10.5/powerpc) is too much work for developers IMHO. Cheers, Sébastien , ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop What are the key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses from deploying virtual desktops? How do next-generation virtual desktops provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and more affordable virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
