I don't believe I messed with the standalone version, though it could easily be 
added, my only focus was the --apt output.  Since i"m not sure what relies on 
the standalone I couldn't test if it would break anything.
---
TS
http://www.southofheaven.org/
Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos!

On 2013-06-24, at 12:05 AM, Daniel Macks <dma...@netspace.org> wrote:

> Global $config is fine in this situation (UseFinkModules 
> compartmentalizes the handling of some initialization, and it does 
> export some Fink::Services functions into the main namespace). 
> 
> Is --apt ode fixed for this new more-detailed output in standalone mode 
> (when /sw/lib/perl5 (or in whatever @BASEPATH@ is defined) doesn't 
> exist? I have fink in /sw, and the finkaptstatus data looks unchanged 
> by this patch when I move aside my /sw/lib/perl5...still has the old 
> format not the extra fields you are adding. 
> 
> dan
> 
> On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 19:36:40 -0600, TheSin <the...@southofheaven.org> wrote:
> Okay now it works, standalone, --apt and --dpkg all tested, hopefully 
> declaring $config as a global isn't bad ;)
>> 
>> -------------------------
>> 
>> ---
>> TS
>> http://www.southofheaven.org/
>> Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos!
>> 
>> On 2013-06-22, at 7:30 PM, TheSin <the...@southofheaven.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> I take it back it only worked with out --apt :\
>>>> Fetched 1072 kB in 4s (222 kB/s)                > Can't locate 
>> Fink/Config.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /Library/Perl/5.12/darwin-th
>>>> I'll keep working on this :\
>>> ---
>>> TS
>>> http://www.southofheaven.org/
>>> Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos!
>>>> On 2013-06-22, at 7:27 PM, TheSin <the...@southofheaven.org> wrote:
>>>>> okay now that I have inet back and hopefully stable, I fixed it 
>> so that I get the right arch now. 
>>>>>> Package: 64bit-cpu
>>>> Status: install ok installed
>>>> Priority: optional
>>>> Architecture: darwin-x86_64
>>>> Version: 0-1
>>>> Maintainer: Fink Devel <fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>>> Description: [virtual package representing the 64bit capability of 
>> the CPU]
>>>> The presence of the 64bit-cpu package indicates that the CPU on which we
>>>> are running is 64bit capable. >> . >> Web site: 
>> http://www.finkproject.org/faq/usage-general.php#virtpackage
>>>> . >> Maintainer: Fink Devel <fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>>>>>>>>> Here is the new patch, hopefully I did it right I 
>> couldn't figure out what or why UseFinkModules() was for or did since 
>> it returns and exports nothing.  If this is wrong please let me know. 
>>>> <fvp.patch>
>>>>>> ---
>>>> TS
>>>> http://www.southofheaven.org/
>>>> Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos!
>>>>>> On 2013-06-21, at 11:56 PM, Daniel Macks <dma...@netspace.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 22:11:20 -0600, TheSin 
>> <the...@southofheaven.org> wrote:
>>>>> The new apt is much more strict on the fields in status files, to 
>> get >>> it to work I need to make a few minor changes to f-v-p, I 
>> spent lots of >>> time working on apt 0.9.82 trying to figure out why 
>> girts weren't >>> working and it turns out the parser was considering 
>> them invalid due to >>> missing fields like arch and priority.  So I 
>> made a quick patch which >>> is in my pull request and i'll attach it 
>> here as well.  I'd add it >>> myself but I'm not sure which branch 
>> and if it'll affect anything else >>> that uses f-v-p
>>>>>>>>>> the current output looks like
>>>>>>>>>> Package: 64bit-cpu
>>>>>> Status: install ok installed
>>>>>> Version: 0-1
>>>>>> description: [virtual package representing the 64bit capability 
>> of the CPU]
>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to change it to look like
>>>>>>>>>> Package: 64bit-cpu
>>>>>> Status: install ok installed
>>>>>> Priority: optional
>>>>>> Architecture: all
>>>>>> Version: 0-1
>>>>>> Maintainer: Fink Devel <fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>>>>> Description: [virtual package representing the 64bit capability 
>> of the CPU]
>>>>>> The presence of the 64bit-cpu package indicates that the CPU on which we
>>>>>> are running is 64bit capable. >>>> . >>>> Web site: 
>> http://www.finkproject.org/faq/usage-general.php#virtpackage
>>>>>> . >>>> Maintainer: Fink Devel <fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>>>>>>> This change to --apt output looks reasonable to me. I talked 
>> to TheSin >>> in #fink yesterday, who confirmed that old apt would 
>> also accept it, so >>> I don't see harm in sending this to master now 
>> (rather than later as >>> part of the large apt upgrade work) (would 
>> also benefit anyone who's >>> experimenting with new debian tools of 
>> any sort). >>> >>> Technical question: Is this really 
>> Architecture:all, given that it's >>> generated by a fink that is 
>> single-arch?
>>>>>>>> dan
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>> Daniel Macks
>>>>> dma...@netspace.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>>>>>>>> Build for Windows Store. 
>>>>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Fink-devel mailing list
>>>>> Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>> List archive:
>>>>> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
>>>>> Subscription management:
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
>>>>> -------------------------
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>> 
>> Build for Windows Store. 
>> 
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev -------------------------
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Fink-devel mailing list
>> Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> List archive:
>> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
>> Subscription management:
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
>> 
> 
>  --
> Daniel Macks
> dma...@netspace.org
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
> 
> Build for Windows Store.
> 
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Fink-devel mailing list
> Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> List archive:
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
> Subscription management:
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Reply via email to