Joel Hacker writes:
> I agree that having native Darwin apps is necessary and even
> noble, but using Xfree86 on Mac OS X isn't really "native"
> anyway
That's a good point: I would be in favour of people spending time
to port X apps to use the native Quartz/Aqua engine, but most of
the stuff I use on a regular basis (with one exception) isn't
guified anyway.
> and it doesn't have to be an "either/or" type proposition.
Unfortunately, I think it would be. Given the resource
constraints (people essentially doing it in their free time),
working on an emulation box would divert resources away from
porting utils to the native OS, wouldn't it?
> Anyway it's just a thought. I would like it, just wanted to
> see what others thought.
That's cool -- it's better to have a bunch of ideas and
discussion floating around, than not.
--
Viktor Haag : Software & Information Design : Research In Motion
+--+
"Unsend! Unsend!"
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
