On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 01:07:30AM -0500, Nicholas Riley wrote: > I'm very confused about what's happening here, as to the best of my > knowledge OpenSSL 0.9.6e was never installed on this system.
Sorry, never mind. Ben Hines pointed a prior mailing list message out to me on IRC, and it turns out that /usr/bin/openssl is statically linked, and: [p8:5008] ~%strings - /usr/lib/libssl/libssl.dylib |grep "0.9.6" SSLv2 part of OpenSSL 0.9.6e 30 Jul 2002 SSLv3 part of OpenSSL 0.9.6e 30 Jul 2002 SSLv2/3 compatibility part of OpenSSL 0.9.6e 30 Jul 2002 TLSv1 part of OpenSSL 0.9.6e 30 Jul 2002 OpenSSL 0.9.6e 30 Jul 2002 even on 10.1.5. Sorry for the spam, and I hope this gets fixed soon :) -- =Nicholas Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <http://www.uiuc.edu/ph/www/njriley> Pablo Research Group, Department of Computer Science and Medical Scholars Program, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
