Not really. I believe that the conflict would be between netpbm and
netpbm10, but only one of these gets installed. The -shlibs can
coexist. Here's what I have on my system:
i netpbm 9.25-3 Graphics manipulation programs and
libraries
i netpbm-bin 10.12-2 Graphics manipulation programs and
libraries
i netpbm-shlibs 9.25-3 Graphics manipulation programs and
libraries
netpbm10 10.12-2 Graphics manipulation programs and
libraries
i netpbm10-shlibs 10.12-2 Graphics manipulation programs and
libraries
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 23:48, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:
> Currently in the stable tree there is netpbm (9.25-3) and netpbm10
> (10.12-2). The strange thing (at least to me) is that one of the
> splitoffs, netpbm-bin, is part of 10.12, but is named to seem to be
> part of 9.25 (eg not netpbm10-bin):
>
> netpbm 9.25-3 Graphics manipulation programs and libraries
> netpbm-bin 10.12-2 Graphics manipulation programs and libraries
> netpbm-shlibs 9.25-3 Graphics manipulation programs and libraries
> netpbm10 10.12-2 Graphics manipulation programs and libraries
> netpbm10-shlibs 10.12-2 Graphics manipulation programs and libraries
>
> I noticed this while trying to rebuild imlib with libpng3 (for sawfish for
> gnome1.4 which stopped working when I upgraded to libpng3) and sawfish
> depends on netpbm.
>
> Here are the BuildDepends/Depends for netpbm-9.25-3:
> Package: netpbm
> Version: 9.25
> Revision: 3
> BuildDepends: libjpeg, libpng3, libtiff
> Depends: %N-shlibs (= %v-%r), %N-bin
> Replaces: netpbm (<< 9.25-1), netpbm10
> Conflicts: netpbm10
>
> Now, netpbm and netpbm10 should not like each other because netpbm9.25
> conflicts with netpbm10 according to the info file. But my commandline
> for installing netpbm is:
>
> nieder % sudo fink install netpbm
> Information about 1125 packages read in 1 seconds.
>
> The following package will be installed or updated:
> netpbm
> The following 3 additional packages will be installed:
> netpbm-bin netpbm-shlibs netpbm10-shlibs
>
> Netpbm and netpbm10 supposedly conflict, but they're both going to be
> installed. Seems to me the only reason netpbm10-shlibs is being installed
> is because netpbm-bin is a splitoff of netpbm, but in reality is a part of
> netpbm10 and that requires netpbm10-shlibs.
>
> Is this the case of a bad naming system or am I missing something?
>
> Hanspeter
--
Alexander K. Hansen
Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University
visiting MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center
Levitated Dipole Experiment
175 Albany Street, NW17-219
Cambridge, MA 02139-4213
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink?
You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing.
What are you waiting for?
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
