Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Benjamin Reed wrote: > [] > > It will, if you're using the new version of fink (0.14.2), and you're > > working in the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree. the "regular" 10.2 tree isn't really > > set up to enforce those kinds of things. > > But, unless it is decided to stop updating the regular 10.2 tree > altogether, shouldn't the unrtf package in 10.2 then have a "GCC: > 3.1" field? >
Yes, absolutely. We should add the GCC field whenver we notice that it is needed (even if it wasn't previously there). -- Dave ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
