Dr. Paul Fons wrote:
In reference to my earlier note, it would appear that fink is not immediately in trouble as my copy of libpcap is libpcap-0.6.2-6.info as opposed to the infected version 0.7.1. I also scanned the sources for the URL that the Houston group posted and didn't find them. This is something to be aware of, however.
You are late with your alert, see
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg03790.html
why does fink need to have it's own pcap? It's already part of the OS
------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
