On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 00:15:58 +0100, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 23:28:41 -0800, > > Matthias Neeracher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>... Now, if there are in fact compelling reasons for you to need > >>clisp 2.32 (other than feeling uncomfortable to be running > >>several releases behind the latest version) ... > > > > > > No, nothing compelling, just that bit about being behind the > > latest version. > > I could offer a compelling reason: The clisp plugin for the latest > texmacs needs clisp-2.32, acoording to the author of the plugin. > > So if you guys have results, or if those packages could be put up > somewhere, you would be welcome. My initial results are positive: I put Matthias' new clisp.info file in my local tree and a little while later I had clisp 2.32 up and running. I've not tried anything really heavy duty, but my small lisp hacks and utilities and physics homework programs all seem to work okay. I suppose I could post the clisp.info file to this list, or even put a .deb file (for Jaguar) up on my web site (or someone else's, for that matter; any takers?); I think there's room. HTH, Dan Sommers -- I hear, and I forget. Dan Sommers I see, and I remember. [insert your own joke here] I do, and I understand. <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Confucius <http://www.tombstonezero.net/dan/> ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
