On 3/31/06, Matt Kozak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since g95 only exists in unstable, it is "new" or so it would seem? > I just did another selfupdate and it looks right now, but this seems > counter-intuitive since fink updated the table when I switched to unstable > (or so it said it did and obviously something made g95 appear when it > was not in the list at all prior)? > IOW, if g95 only exists in unstable and switching to same made it appear, > then where (and why) is fink getting the 0.50.20051215 version info.? > Perhaps it's there but hidden in the stable tree? Perhaps it had this > info. from my last (stable tree) self-update and it just "appeared" when I > switched to the unstable tree (in that case, then it's a bit misleading > when it says that it's updating the table). I'm confused... > > Sorry for troubling the maintainer. > > Thanks, > -Matt >
Nope--that's the only version we have, and it's only in the unstable tree. You had information from a prior version because you hadn't run a selfupdate. Fink Commander's "update table" only reads information from your computer--it doesn't read any new package information from the Internet. -- Alexander K. Hansen Fink Documenter [Day Job] Levitated Dipole Experiment http://psfcwww2.psfc.mit.edu/ldx/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
