Alexander K. Hansen wrote: > Marc Baaden wrote: [] >> In this particular case, I think it might eventually be desirable to >> have both a paraview and a paraview-mpi in the packages list (like is >> the case eg for gromacs). Whom should/could I talk to for such a suggestion? >> > The package maintainer: Martin Costabel costabel AT wanadoo DOT fr
That would be me; sorry for not responding earlier, I was offline for a couple of days. I have now made paraview-mpi packages with lammpi and openmpi variants and put them into 10.4/unstable. They seem to build and start up OK, but I would need help testing, as I know nothing about mpi and next to nothing about paraview. Unlike the gromacs packages, these paraview packages are just one big chunk each, and they conflict/replace each other. I don't know if it is possible/desirable to cut them into smaller pieces only some of which would depend on mpi and the rest could be common to all of them. -- Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
