Mark J. Reed wrote: [] > The question is, is there a right way? If you just install the > completion rules anyway, a subsequent attempt to install bash-completion > will complain about the existing files. If you don't install them > unless the package is there, then a subsequent installation means you > don't get the custom rules for daemonic. Which means that the packages > essentially have to be installed in a particular order, even though > there's no actual dependency.
No, this is not what happens. Fink packages only complain about what other packages install if they are trying to install the same *files*. And in such a case, the order of installation does not matter, unless one of them has a "Replaces" field and the other one doesn't. If two packages install the same *directories*, there is no conflict. And this is what happens here. Both packages install the directory /sw/etc/bash_completion.d, but there is no common file. -- Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
