* Christopher Bort on Monday, August 25, 2008 at 12:31:56 -0700 > I've recently installed gimp2 on my MacBook (OS X 10.4.11, fink > 0.28.5) , which installed gimp-2.4. I expected fink to create a > symlink in /sw/bin so that it could be run as 'gimp' or 'gimp2', > but it did not. Is my expectation misguided, or is this an > oversight in the gimp2 package? This isn't really a problem, as > 'gimp-2.4' runs fine, but it is a little annoying. It feels like > a minor burr that didn't get filed off in fink's fit-and-finish.
As $ fink info gimp2 says, you have to install additionally eg. the gimp2-default package. c -- Was heißt hier Dogma, ich bin Underdogma! [ What the hell do you mean dogma, I am underdogma. ] _F R E E_ _V I D E O S_ -->> http://www.blacktrash.org/underdogma/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
