On 08/25/08 12:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christian Ebert) wrote: >* Christopher Bort on Monday, August 25, 2008 at 12:31:56 -0700 >>I've recently installed gimp2 on my MacBook (OS X 10.4.11, >>fink 0.28.5) , which installed gimp-2.4. I expected fink to >>create a symlink in /sw/bin so that it could be run as 'gimp' >>or 'gimp2', but it did not. Is my expectation misguided, or is >>this an oversight in the gimp2 package? This isn't really a >>problem, as 'gimp-2.4' runs fine, but it is a little annoying. >>It feels like a minor burr that didn't get filed off in fink's fit-and-finish. > >As > >$ fink info gimp2 > >says, you have to install additionally eg. the gimp2-default >package.
Duh. Sorry for the noise. 8-\ -- Christopher Bort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.thehundredacre.net/> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
