Daniel E. Macks wrote: [] >> We probably ought to add this as a BuildDepend. It looks like this is >> needed on 10.5 as well, though for my test, in which I renamed >> /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk to something else, the package silently >> misbuilt instead of failing at configure time. > > It appears that the SDK is only needed if one is on 10.5 and is trying > to build a binary that would be portable back to 10.4 machines and/or > would be a fat binary. Fink doesn't support either of those two > things. I committed an updated aquaterm-1.0.1-4 (test-built on 10.4 > and 10.5 thanks akh!) that does not appear to need the 10.4u SDK.
Just for the record, to prevent misunderstandings: The previous version of aquaterm did *not* build universal binaries, because it already had the right ARCHS= directive. This had been fixed a couple of months ago. The pulling in of the 10.4u SDK was not needed, it was just done by xcodebuild gratuitously (and had wrongly been considered harmless at the time, probably because no one had tested on 10.4 without the 10.4u SDK). The new patch file removes this pulling in. -- Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
