At 9:43 AM +0200 9/4/08, Martin Costabel wrote:
>Daniel E. Macks wrote:
>[]
>>>  We probably ought to add this as a BuildDepend.  It looks like this is
>>>  needed on 10.5 as well, though for my test, in which I renamed
>>>  /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk to something else, the package silently
>>>  misbuilt instead of failing at configure time.
>>
>>  It appears that the SDK is only needed if one is on 10.5 and is trying
>>  to build a binary that would be portable back to 10.4 machines and/or
>>  would be a fat binary. Fink doesn't support either of those two
>>  things. I committed an updated aquaterm-1.0.1-4 (test-built on 10.4
>>  and 10.5 thanks akh!) that does not appear to need the 10.4u SDK.
>
>Just for the record, to prevent misunderstandings:
>The previous version of aquaterm did *not* build universal binaries,
>because it already had the right ARCHS= directive. This had been fixed a
>couple of months ago. The pulling in of the 10.4u SDK was not needed, it
>was just done by xcodebuild gratuitously (and had wrongly been
>considered harmless at the time, probably because no one had tested on
>10.4 without the 10.4u SDK). The new patch file removes this pulling in.
>
>--
>Martin

With this, I installed aquaterm successfully. Thanks Martin et al... Jonathan

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Reply via email to