Alexander Hansen wrote: > On Dec 29, 2008, at 8:29 PM, M. Singh wrote: > >> I am trying to set up xournal on a Leopard machine (I am used to using >> this on my linux machines). >> >> The compilation fails (fink install xournal) : >> >> gcc -g -O2 -L/sw/lib -o xournal main.o xo-misc.o xo-file.o xo- >> paint.o >> xo-print.o xo-support.o xo-interface.o xo-callbacks.o xo-shapes.o >> -L/sw/lib/pango-ft219/lib -L/sw/lib/fontconfig2/lib >> -L/sw/lib/freetype219/lib -L/sw/lib -Wl,-framework,CoreServices >> -Wl,-framework,ApplicationServices -lgnomeprintui-2-2 -lgnomeprint-2-2 >> -lgnomecanvas-2 -lxml2 -lart_lgpl_2 -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 >> -latk-1.0 -lgio-2.0 -lpangoft2-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lpangocairo-1.0 >> -lcairo -lpango-1.0 -lfreetype -lz -lfontconfig -lgobject-2.0 >> -lgmodule-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -lintl >> Undefined symbols: >> "_XGrabButton", referenced from: >> _attempt_screenshot_bg in xo-file.o >> "_XWindowEvent", referenced from: >> _attempt_screenshot_bg in xo-file.o >> "_XUngrabButton", referenced from: >> _attempt_screenshot_bg in xo-file.o >> ld: symbol(s) not found >> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status >> make[2]: *** [xournal] Error 1 >> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 >> make: *** [all] Error 2 >> ### execution of /var/tmp/tmp.1.Jcz223 failed, exit code 2 >> >> >> I have X11 installed (Xquartz - latest version 2.3.1). > > I got the same thing (10.5.6/PowerPC/Xcode 3.1.2). This may be a > result of the recent gtk+2 updates.
Tried to selfupdate today. No difference. The missing symbols appear to be X symbols and not gtk related. But I could be wrong. > >> >> Second - is it possible to tell fink installation to use the existing >> MacTeX 2008 install of texlive instead of installing tetex-texmf ? >> Don't >> want to waste disk space. >> > > Not currently. We found that the upstream TeX packagers liked to > change things around and break our placeholder packages. Is there any estimated time frame when this might be done ? The project can insist on users installing the full 1.15GB MacTeX 2008 package (which is pretty static) if you want - this dependence on an unmaintained, large, separate piece of code, which offers users nothing, and will cause problems in a few months (as texlive diverges more and more from it), is a major problem. I am deploying a custom Mac configuration with the tools I need on an old notebook with limited disk space, and wasting space on something like this, for which I see no cogent reason, appears criminal to me. I do not presume to criticize the work, which is splendid in itself, and made the thought of using Mac on a notebook less daunting, but I find this aspect of this business a little surprising. > >> Third - aren't there pre-compiled versions of xournal available (like >> apt-get on Ubuntu/Debian) ? > > Not through official channels. We don't do binaries from our unstable > tree. There are unofficial repositories; however, since the package > appears to be broken right now, they don't have a way to generate it, > either. Ok. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
