guile 2.0.11 committed to 10.7 tree. Care to test on 10.8+?
Fang
> I also asked upstream in #guile, they are aware of some clang issues, some of
> which have been addresed in 2.0.11, which I have not yet updated. It's on my
> radar now, I'll find some time to try it. But you don't have to wait for me
> :)
>
> Fang
>
>> On 1/04/14 00:51, David Fang wrote:
>> > Martin,
>> > Thanks for the report. I don't have 10.8/9 to test, only
>> > 10.7.
>> > Something looks odd in your patch, the redirection -- I would expect it
>> > to
>> > look like:
>> > ${cpp} ... | sed ... > ${temp}
>> > instead of:
>> > ${cpp} ... > | sed ... ${temp}
>> > Can you confirm what you tried (guile18)?
>>
>> You are right, of course. One shouldn't improve patch files manually after
>> having tested :-)
>>
>>
>
>
--
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
[email protected]
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
