guile 2.0.11 committed to 10.7 tree. Care to test on 10.8+? Fang
> I also asked upstream in #guile, they are aware of some clang issues, some of > which have been addresed in 2.0.11, which I have not yet updated. It's on my > radar now, I'll find some time to try it. But you don't have to wait for me > :) > > Fang > >> On 1/04/14 00:51, David Fang wrote: >> > Martin, >> > Thanks for the report. I don't have 10.8/9 to test, only >> > 10.7. >> > Something looks odd in your patch, the redirection -- I would expect it >> > to >> > look like: >> > ${cpp} ... | sed ... > ${temp} >> > instead of: >> > ${cpp} ... > | sed ... ${temp} >> > Can you confirm what you tried (guile18)? >> >> You are right, of course. One shouldn't improve patch files manually after >> having tested :-) >> >> > > -- David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users