On 4/6/14, 1:40 PM, Gary K Olson wrote:

> On 4/4/14, 8:45 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> 
> You can see if you have the updated fink via "fink dumpinfo -ePATH gelemental"
> 
> Information about 8133 packages read in 1 seconds.
> PATH=/sw/var/lib/fink/path-prefix-libcxx:/sw/var/lib/fink/path-prefix-clang:/sw/bin:/sw/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/X11R6/bin

I got:

[MacBkPro2:~]:-bash:502$: fink dumpinfo -ePATH gelemental
Information about 8142 packages read in 2 seconds.
PATH=/sw/var/lib/fink/path-prefix-libcxx:/sw/bin:/sw/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/X11R6/bin

So, I think I am ok with the updated fink. 

> On 4/5/14, 12:09 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
> 
> Googling for this sort of compatiblity problem (I don't actually know 
> anything about this specific situation) suggests the portable solution 
> is to use boost. And gelemental itself seems like a dead upstream.

If elemental is dead upstream, maybe our efforts would be better spent on other 
issues.  Chalk one more up to Apple destroying part of X11 and gcc in their 
efforts to make the Mac more secure.

Gary K Olson
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Reply via email to