On Sun, 06 Apr 2014 14:14:42 -0600, "Gary K. Olson" <garykol...@mac.com> wrote: > On 4/5/14, 12:09 AM, Daniel Macks wrote: >> >> Googling for this sort of compatiblity problem (I don't actually know >> anything about this specific situation) suggests the portable solution >> is to use boost. And gelemental itself seems like a dead upstream. >> > If elemental is dead upstream, maybe our efforts would be better > spent on other issues. Chalk one more up to Apple destroying part > of X11 and gcc in their efforts to make the Mac more secure.
Does gperiodic build for you? It seems to fill the same niche. dan -- Daniel Macks dma...@netspace.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Put Bad Developers to Shame Dominate Development with Jenkins Continuous Integration Continuously Automate Build, Test & Deployment Start a new project now. Try Jenkins in the cloud. http://p.sf.net/sfu/13600_Cloudbees_APR _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
