On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 4:15 AM Martinus WERTS <martinus.we...@ens-rennes.fr> wrote: > > Now I would like to go 3D, and the symmetry of our system would allow to > use a 2D cylindrical grid (r,z) - with zero flux at z=0 and z=L (and > r=0), and either Dirichlet/zero flux at r=R. Looking at the mailing list > archive and GitHub, it appears that cylindrical coordinates are at the > moment not working properly (missing factor)
Yes, that's correct. Sorry about that. > Is this still the case? > > If so, I will start with a simple 3D Cartesian mesh, and then perhaps > move to more adapted meshes, depending on the calculation speed and the > precision required. Perhaps the cylindrical coordinates will be fixed in > a near future? Maybe, the developers of FiPy aren't doing an awful lot of work on it so there is no timeline for fixing it. > Many thanks for any advice that you may have Sorry that I can't be more helpful. -- Daniel Wheeler _______________________________________________ fipy mailing list fipy@nist.gov http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy [ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
