{#} Replies are directed back to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
{#} To reply to the author, write to Eric Peyton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Friday, November 9, 2001, at 01:39 PM, Hans Gerwitz wrote:
> {#} Replies are directed back to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> {#} To reply to the author, write to Hans Gerwitz
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Can't the label of the "Buddy Name" field become a property of the
> service
> module? ICQ would say UIN, Y!M would say Yahoo ID, etc?
Yes, but this would require the user to specifically choose a service
that they are adding a buddy too before entering the buddy name. It's
not a simple approach.
>
> I know this is a big bite to chew, and I don't know Cocoa, but is it
> conceivable that some day each service can run in a protected thread so
> crashes don't bring down all of Fire?
>
Conceivably yes. We've talked about moving each service connection into
it's own thread. This will help with login times, etc. Crashes will
still most likely bring down fire. There is not enough time in a year
to make fire completely crash resistant (partly due to the sheer amount
of "foreign" code in fire).
Eric
> Eric's most annoying user,
> Hans Gerwitz
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> {#} ----------------------------------------------------+[ fire ]+---
>
>
{#} ----------------------------------------------------+[ fire ]+---
