On Dec 29, 2012, at 1:43 AM, C D Tavares wrote: > On Dec 28, 2012, at 7:09 PM, Joseph E. Olson wrote: > >> In an imaginary world where every charged criminal every year (1) used >> a gun for every violent crime AND (2) used a different gun for each >> crime, A COMPLETELY UNREALISTIC SCENARIO > > The last study I saw on this topic was a bit old, but pretty spectactular; > reporting that one of the first comprehensive forensic examinations of > bullets from homicides in Washington DC arrived at the somewhat startling > conclusion that over hundred homicides (the bulk of the year's tally) had > been committed with as few as 13 individual guns. I know I have this study > on file somewhere, but just spend over a hour in a pretty exhaustive search > and failed to locate it. :-(
Thanks to John Briggs, who provided me with enough keywords to locate the original posting and cite: > From: John Garrett > Subject: CBS Evening News > Date: April 26, 1994 4:23:22 PM MST > > Tonight the CBS Evening News ran a story on a study of murders > in Washington, DC over the last 12 months. Of 460+ murders in the city, > police expected to have 460+ suspects to track. With ATF help, it was > determined that the majority of ALL murders was committed with a VERY > FEW weapons, something on the order of 13. The Assistant Secretery of > the Treasury [I forgot his name, HELP ME OUT HERE] had suspected that > such would be the case, and his view was proven right. Instead of a > nearly 1:1 correlation [1] that the anti-gunners seem to expect, the > ratio, based on the data as I remember it is over 460:13 [0.028]. > Bravo to CBS for finally doing the right thing. We need to take > this information to our reps to help defeat pending "assault weapons" > legislation. Seems like an awful lot of legal energy spent on a very > few criminals. Does Gary Kleck know about this study? Does anybody > have his address? Did anybody happen to tape this piece? > >> This was 13 unique, serial numbered pieces of steel -- not 13 "types" of >> firearms (like ".38 revolvers") -- right? > > That's right. I called GOAL and told them they should look up the piece, > as well as NRA. I then realized I could go back in time, so I called my > buddy in Tucson and asked him to tape the West Coast feed, so I could be > precise with the info, and give out names, like the Asst. Secy of > Treasury, who had believed that many of the shootings had occured with > few weapons. The ATF took brass from the scene and lead from the coroner > or wherever they could get it, and did the matches. Guns can be uniquely > identified by spent brass, so lead is not mandatory, but helps the case. > I'll keep the list posted when I get more info. > John -- Escape the Rat Race for Peace, Quiet, and Miles of Desert Beauty Take a Sanity Break at The Bunkhouse at Liberty Haven Ranch http://libertyhaven.com _______________________________________________ To post, send message to Firearmsregprof@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.