I fear I may have to write a full critique of this, for some elements are 
simply weird.

 

Interestingly, the introduction begins with “Guns figure prominently in the 
violent lives and deaths of women.” But in the summary, the following numbers 
are presented:

 

Incidents                          100%

Hands, fists, feet             19%

Weapons (all)                  5%

Guns                                  2%

 

So the claim that “Guns figure prominently” is prima facie inepta. 
Interestingly, nearly 27,000 incidents of “violence” were of an uncategorized 
nature, though after their review of guns (all 2% of incidents) they noted acts 
of violence including “pushing and shoving, grabbing, pulling hair, slapping, 
punching, kicking, biting, stabbing, and strangling”, though they did not 
specially state that this was about 75% of all incidents.

 

But the main weakness is the data comes from one city, Philly, which contends 
with some very interesting subculture issues. Social/cultural attitude differ 
vastly from region to region, so the study is a bit myopic. 

 

A quick search of the paper shows that the word “defense” (as in 
“self-defense”) never appears, so the threat/injury perspective is incomplete.

 

It gets a bit stranger. In Table I (“Nature of Gun Involvement”) they include 
everything, including no involvement of a gun. To wit:

 

Threatened in person (no gun shown) to shoot (17.7%)

Threatened via phone/email/text to shoot (9.0%)

Victim fearful because offender known to have or carry gun (5.7%)

Just there during the incident/was carrying (4.2%)

Gun stolen/taken in context of IPV incident (2.8%)

 

Oddly, their conclusion section also states “Victims of IPV against whom a gun 
was used were less likely to have visible injuries, were far more likely to 
have been threatened, and were substantially more likely to be frightened.”

 

The adage says “publish or perish”. Sometimes not publishing is the right 
approach.

 

 

Guy Smith

 <mailto:g...@gunfacts.info> g...@gunfacts.info

www.linkedin.com/in/gunfacts/

 

 

 

 

 

 

From: firearmsregprof-boun...@lists.ucla.edu 
[mailto:firearmsregprof-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Michael Miller
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 9:42 AM
To: Firearmsregprof@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: Guns in Intimate Partner Violence: Comparing Incidents by Type of 
Weapon

 

Has anyone reviewed the recent article, Guns in Intimate Partner Violence: 
Comparing Incidents by Type of Weapon by Susan B. Sorenson? 

 

Located at http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/jwh.2016.5832

_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Firearmsregprof@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to