Den 2012-01-01 23:25 skrev Dimitry Sibiryakov såhär: > 01.01.2012 21:31, Kjell Rilbe wrote: >> So far, these are the suggestions I've seen > Hey, how about my suggestion leave everything as is and perform > backup-restore cycle on > demand?.. > > Pros: > - No overhead. > - No additional disk space. > - No code change. > Cons: > - DBA with brain is required. Yes, of course! But you're forgetting this: Con: - If the no downtime is acceptable, it requires special measures to be able to keep the system running during a backup-restore cycle, e.g. cluster.
Personally I don't know much about clustering or FB replication, so I can't really say if this is a big problem or not. But from what I've read in this thread it is not without problems. And I think we can live without the sarcasm inherent in your con. Kjell -- -------------------------------------- Kjell Rilbe DataDIA AB E-post: kj...@datadia.se Telefon: 08-761 06 55 Mobil: 0733-44 24 64 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
