> > > > > In sum, according to trace: While the 75 page buffers restore took > > > 601030ms, the 100000 page buffers restore took 375253ms. > > > > > What's the restore time if, with SS, you just leave the buffers at the > default of 2048? Or even set it to 10240?
Forgot to mention, my previous tests have been using SuperClassic. Another SC test with 2048 buffers: 525415ms Some SS tests with different buffers. Same hardware (SATA-II in that case), same restore location, simply just another server instance using SS. 2048: 522441ms 10240: 424276ms 100000: 403195ms > 75 is way too low. I'm not even sure it makes sense as a default for > classic these days if server is 64 bit. Yep. Regards, Thomas ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
