10.08.2014 11:11, Reinier Olislagers wrote: > Of course, my view is that it should be the other way round: FB should > be compatible with languages, but your answer is clear enough.
It is compatible. It's C++ interface is compatible with MSVC and GCC. It's C interface is compatible with everyone who is compatible with C. Firebird isn't written in Pascal (Java, ADA, Cobol, Basic, Prolog, Python, PHP, LUA, etc), that's why it doesn't provide native Pascal (Java, ADA, Cobol, Basic, Prolog, Python, PHP, LUA, etc) interface. Situation is simple: either you (can) use one of two interfaces provided by Firebird or not. The latter is not Firebird problem. "One size (interface) fits all" isn't working in modern programming languages zoo. -- WBR, SD. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
