On 18/04/2017 13:43, Vlad Khorsun wrote: > Some time ago there was discussion about sharing snapshots. As for me, it > is useful feature. Not a "must have", but useful. > > With current implementation of database snapshots (private copy of TIP) > it is not enough just to specify "base" transaction number to obtain its > snapshot, especially for Classic.
Can you please explain more? > But, with new snapshots acounting (based > on commit order, proposed by Nickolay) it will be enough to get just one > number from the "base" transaction. > Is it the post "Statement-level read consistency and intermediate versions GC" in this list or another one? Adriano ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
