11.10.2017 21:34, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
I must agree that host:service_mgr is weird, but not all services expects (or would expect) a database.
Can't say it is weird. Probably, we could allow to skip service manager name, but it will be hard to specify XNET protocol without it. I.e. now we could use xnet://sevice_mgr. And, of course, i agree with you that service could expect no or more than one database name. Regards, Vlad ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
