> the core developers don't document the actual protocol, because reverse > engineering from the code and by using things like WireShark is > extremely painful, confusing and error prone. With the batch API it's > even worse IMHO, because even the usage examples seem to be incomplete, > and too basic/simple and glosses over things.
I'll add one pain point. Companies/people/developers are using Firebird and expect to have new features available (in .NET in my case) in timely manner. But when I need to keep fishing and trying options here and there the progress is slow and everybody is unhappy (and even looking for other options). -- Mgr. Jiří Činčura https://www.tabsoverspaces.com/ Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
