Helen Borrie hele...@iinet.net.au [firebird-support] wrote: > At 02:36 p.m. 30/10/2014, Geoff Worboys > ge...@telesiscomputing.com.au [firebird-support] wrote:
>>Doesn't that depend on how they implemented the separate threads? >>SS does/can use different threads for separate connections to the >>same database, can't it? So if the threads operate over separate >>connections then wouldn't SS be able to use multiple CPUs? > Not in 2.5 (Dmitry will correct me if I'm wrong, I hope!), > but I'm fairly sure it's a Yes in Fb 3. AFAIR, in 2.5, > multiple CPUs will be used for connections to multiple > databases if they are available. We're talking here about SS. > SC behaves the way you describe, as far as I understand. Hmm... Yes, my mistake, you are correct (as if there was ever any doubt :-) http://www.firebirdsql.org/file/fb25_architecture_comparison.pdf Obviously time I re-read the FB v2.5 release notes again. -- Geoff Worboys Telesis Computing Pty Ltd
