On Aug 18, 1:30 pm, sir_brizz <bj.car...@gmail.com> wrote: ... > As far as script debugging and in-debugger resource tracking, those do > have to be enabled on each page. Overall the debugger just acts a lot > more like 1.2 with some features of 1.3 and some features that Firebug > just doesn't have at all (like being able to open the scrip panel on > any section) which is probably why I am drawn to it. ... Being able to open the script panel on any section? What does it mean? jjb --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
- Re: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? dan_m2k
- Re: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? dan_m2k
- Re: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? sir_brizz
- Re: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? johnjbarton
- Re: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? sir_brizz
- Re: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? johnjbarton
- Re: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? goodtest
- Re: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? johnjbarton
- Re: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? sir_brizz
- Re: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? sir_brizz
- Re: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? johnjbarton
- Re: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? sir_brizz
- Re: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? dan_m2k
- Re: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? Scott Shumaker
- Re: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? johnjbarton
- Re: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? Scott Shumaker
- Re: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? nroussi
- RE: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? Trevan Richins
- Re: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? johnjbarton
- Re: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? ebusyness
- Re: Firebug 1.4 - A step backwards? goodtest