Firebug is evolving fast. So should do its website. Take for example http://getfirebug.com/network. The network panel shown in the screenshots is not looking like so at all anymore (see FB 1.5 or even 1.6) and several (new) features are not described like e. g. the timeline info popup or the "Cache" tab for cached files etc. Of course the wiki is free to be edited by the community, but there's still a big gap of feature descriptions. And the persons, which know best about the features of Firebug, are the developers themselves. I already saw many issues at the Google Code pages of Firebug and also some newsgroup entries, that could have been avoided, if the wiki would describe Firebug's features (even hidden ones) and be more up-to- date.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
