Yes, agree the current page is quite outdated. Please report a new bug here: http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/entry?template=Documentation%20defect%20report
so it's not forgotten and I'll take a look at it. Thanks! Honza On Apr 20, 11:37 am, Sebo <[email protected]> wrote: > Firebug is evolving fast. So should do its website. > Take for examplehttp://getfirebug.com/network. The network panel > shown in the screenshots is not looking like so at all anymore (see FB > 1.5 or even 1.6) and several (new) features are not described like e. > g. the timeline info popup or the "Cache" tab for cached files etc. > Of course the wiki is free to be edited by the community, but there's > still a big gap of feature descriptions. And the persons, which know > best about the features of Firebug, are the developers themselves. I > already saw many issues at the Google Code pages of Firebug and also > some newsgroup entries, that could have been avoided, if the wiki > would describe Firebug's features (even hidden ones) and be more up-to- > date. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Firebug" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
