Hi Honza Yes I'm running the latest. I was really very hopeful when I read somewhere that this bug had been fixed so naturally I nabbed the latest Firebug version here at home. I can't afford to experiment with beta version at work until this sort of performance bug is fixed. Unfortunately 1.9b4 doesn't seem to be have made a difference. I wish I could be more specific, I'll give it some thought, though I don't have a lot of spare time.
I wish I could convince my workplace to let me work on Firebug one or two days a week. It is one of the big holes in the open source model that freeloaders get endless value from free software and inevitably pay nothing for it in any sense whether that be paying someone to contribute code or mere donations. Imagine if Firebug was a commercial product. Would it have more developers? Anyway that's a digression. What sort of data can I help generate along with steps-to-reproduce details? My judgement that 1.9b4 didn't work was based on seeing zombie compartments. Unfortunately there are no timestamps against about:memory entries so it's difficult to be absolutely precise with timing data regarding what length of time constitutes a zombie compartment. I might mention the timestamp idea to the MemShrink people. I do have the highly under-publicized Mozilla Profile Manager to help with the otherwise messy business of running new profiles and parallel instances. Jan Honza Odvarko wrote: > Btw. pd: what Firebug version do you use? > > Did you try 1.9b4? Is that any better? > > Honza -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/firebug
