>I agree that security shouldn't be "weighted" in a mix with unrelated >factors. I think that we should be able to provide our own "weighting" with these reviews. Hence, I prefer an objective review, and not a "best of" review. Areas of performance are important to you or me might not be as important to others. >I also think that ease of use is important, because a difficult interface >increases the likelihood that important components in a theoretically high >security rating will be misconfigured or go unused, thus lowering the >overall security of the system. Excellent point. What about cost as area of concern? Brian Steele - [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
